Questions for Vibrator:

VIBRATOR—


  1.  To clarify your comments Re the Thermocore Ni / H runaway reaction, a 
good physical model of the VACUUM is warranted.
  2.  2. I think you are suggesting that the Rossi      SKL reactor is a dusty 
plasma of Bosons and Fermions of discrete entangled systems—I am not certain at 
all.\3.
  3.  I so agree that increase of entropy among  a population of closed say 
stems entails transfer of enthalpy  per the 2nd law of TH.
  4.  Small quantities of Ni powder and H should runaway also, unless t size of 
the various Ni  crystals is insufficient to heat the other particles to 
reacting phonic resonant  spin quanta-angular momentum.
  5.  A magnetic field applied to the reactants may allow better control of the 
phase changes of the various QM systems’ spin energy states.

Bob  Cook

From: Vibrator !<mailto:mrvibrat...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 7:13 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-L@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The "hero" LENR experiment ?

In light of Rossi's apparent lead i'd be looking at the possibility of 
spontaneous formation of novel condensates.  The D2 diatomic molecule being a 
boson presents an obvious soft target for aligning spins to cohere into shared 
lower-energy quantum states, the different magnetic moments of the electron and 
nucleus of the deuterium atom passing through the high magnetic moments of the 
Ni powder might cause some degree of polarisation and/or phase coherence, etc. 
- the basic idea being to cultivate an optimal fluctuation in Fermi numbers / 
system entropy relative to surrounding environmental free electrons (such as in 
the reactor casing, say), which may adopt the lower-energy quantum states 
vacated by the formation of the condensates; thus forcing the vacuum to assign 
higher Fermi numbers / quantum energy states to any fermions exiting a 
collapsing condensate than they initially carried into it.  This manifests as 
an exothermic gain accumulating over many such cycles..

..until thermal phase begins to approach resonant modes with certain quantum 
phases (such as the zitterbewegung phase), resulting in further 
quantum-classical coherence and allowing like-polarised electrons to begin 
sharing Fermi numbers, so adopting the lowest available energy state but also 
causing precipitous fluctuations in system entropy relative to the environment, 
surrounding free electrons instantly co-opting lower Fermi numbers as they 
become available, and so causing the vacuum to assign necessarily-higher 
quantum energy states to fermions exiting transiently-coherent quasi-bosonic 
states and yadda yadda runaway feedback loop.

Vacuum / ZP energy, bashically, a la EM OU - the accelerated / heated fermions 
exiting the meta-stable bosonic states being impelled by a flux of positive 
h-bar endowed by virtual photons corralled from vacuum per QED - ie. the actual 
form of the gain being normal Coulomb repulsion between decohering fermions, 
albeit with vacuum-inflated quantum energy states.

LENR effects may be epiphenomenal to the common energy gain principle, an 
almost incidental artefact of spontaneous long-range coupling between nuclei 
immersed in a matrix of coherent quasi-bosons allowing them to interact in some 
sense as if already within one another's proton radii, presumably conserving 
baryon number if not initial disposition (again, a different kind of effective 
Coulomb exploit).  The key dynamic would simply be that transiently-stable 
shared lower-energy quantum states free up Fermi numbers that any environmental 
fermions in higher energy states will automatically drop down into, 
necessitating the assigning of higher Fermi numbers to those departing these 
shared states, thus energising these collapses with an extra kick of ambient 
h-bar from vacuum.

This is basically what Rossi's doing via contained cold plasmas - time-critical 
selective-energisation of electrons over ions causing like-polasrised 
condensates of the former to precipitate out onto the latter, forming 
transiently-stable structures with an emission line consistent with the 
precessional moment of a protium-nucleated thermo-ZBW condensate;  decoherence 
of which (reinstating Pauli exclusion) yields excess energy, the cycle 
requiring cool-off time to prevent ions gaining thermal equilibrium with 
electrons (via normal dissipation), hence a discontinuous / pulsed cycle, in 
order to maintain the formative 'non-thermal plasma' state for consistently 
culturing these exotic self-reactive species and the huge fluctuations in 
internal vs ambient entropy / quantum energy states their concerted phase 
transitions apply.  Crucially, the system remains thermodynamically open to 
(and dependent upon) the environmental exchange of entropy, 2LoT itself putting 
the vacuum in a bind, which then HAS to assign higher energy states to 
decohering fermions due to their formerly-vacated states having been reoccupied 
the instant any up-up or down-down condensate initially formed..  and so a 
'logic trap for nature', type stuff.
TL;DR - mebe the Thermacore runaway was inadvertent EM OU resulting from 
exothermic closed-cycling of spontaneous fermion-boson-fermion phase 
transitions - perhaps helped along by chance resonance with ambient phonon 
phases - between molecular and atomic D2 - until reaching breakdown temps, at 
which point the fermionic D2 atoms become bosonic ions and fermionic up/down 
electrons which then want - through shear thermodynamic expediency - to form 
like-polarised quasi-bosons sharing a unitary quantum energy state;  
everything's jumping back and forth across the Pauli exclusion barrier in 
sweeping phase transitions - that's just what happens when a gas of atomic and 
molecular D2 gets ionised - and because nature only cares about balancing the 
books in the given instant, refermionisation events per se (such as bosenovas) 
may be ideal bait'n'switch / shell games for wrangling unilateral Coulomb 
repulsion from ZPE.  Rather than a 2LoT violation, a kind of negentropic open 
system..

Compounding anecdote with wild speculation, no doubt, but a different angle no 
less..

Reply via email to