I thought that mass was a state change reaction involving the Higgs field???
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:23 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Jones— > > > > And lets not forget Philippe Hatt’s model of the makeup of the proton, > neutron and muons (consistent with Stubb’s data and theory.) > > > > About Hatt reported the following: > > > > “I was recently in Sochi ,Russia to present my views to colleagues and was > asked to write articles to be published on that Unification topic..I am > about to write the first one . > May be ,I could send a copy to the Vortex list as these articles will > anyway be written in English ? > Please ,do not hesitate to send me your ideas ,advice on that proposal.” > > > > Thus, all physicists are not ignoring these models. Hatt just finished a > revised model for the Russians (Yury Bazhutov, etal.,) after the > presentation he made to the group in Russia. > > > > He recently reported this follow up: > > > > “1. Actually Newton's laws suppose that there is an instantaneous > transmission , > > So ,the third law about action/reaction says that both are equivalent and > opposed. > > Nevertheless ,we know that there is no instantaneous transmission since > time intervenes .This is invaliding Newton's laws in the way that action > occurs prior to reaction ,giving an advantage to action and breaking the > symmetry between action and reaction. > > > > 2. According to my theory (see: philippehatt.com) the creation of mass > occurs prior to its annihilation ,breaking symmetry between these two > phenomena and giving rise to our material universe .Actually there is much > more mass and antimass(resulting from the annihilation of mass ) than the > mass observed in the universe ."Normally ",we perceive only the mass > resulting from the action of creation of mass and the reaction of > annihilation of that same mass (mass - antimass). > > > > 3. Electromagnetism is ,according to my theory, the combination of mass > and antimass. > > Mass + antimass= negative electromagnetism ,antimass + mass = positive > electromagnetism.The neutron has a negative dipolar magnetic moment,the > proton has a positive one.Moreover the alpha particle's magnetic moment is > null.The matter (which is the result of mass and antimass ,as well as of > electromagnetism ) is influenced by electromagnetism which is nothing else > than mass and antimass. > > > > 4. At which level is this influence exerted? At the quantum level where > mass and > > antimass should be perceivable .So, matter and electromagnetism are two > expressions of the same quantum phenomenon,hence the possibility of > interaction between them ,even at some distance . > > > > Happy to discuss. I am presently preparing a number of papers for Russian > editing .The first one concerns mass and antimass .The second will deal > with electromagnetism , the third with neutron/proton differences ,the > fourth being about electron and antineutrino and the fifth studying binding > energy and LENR.” > > > > Bob Cook > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* JonesBeene <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:12:24 AM > *To:* Vortex List > *Subject:* [Vo]:No, Melting Quarks Will Never Work > > > > > > “No, Melting Quarks Will Never Work As An Energy Source” > > > > This is from Forbes – not Fusion Technology, but it is hard to argue with > it. > > https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/11/08/no- > melting-quarks-will-never-work-as-an-energy-source/#f23d01922327 > > > > However, there are other similar descriptions which semantically fall into > place as a kind of “melting” of quarks at much lower energy, which would be > outside this argument. To wit, the Holmlid effect. Here is an earlier > thread on Stubbs and Holmlid. > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg104933.html > > > > The Holmlid effect of muon production from hydrogen annihilation, under > William Stubbs’ theory is basically this (paraphrased to account for > Holmlid): > > All matter is composed of leptons. The proton mass is composed of nine > leptons whose mass is each about 1⁄9 that of a proton - there are three > groupings of three and these are quarks. The particles which give quarks > mass are identified as the muon/antimuon and have unit negative and > positive charge, respectively so that there is a net positive charge of 1 > in the proton. > > > > The combined mass of nine muons is 1,863 electron masses which is 27 > electron masses greater -- but since the interaction is “binding” in the > technical sense, a mass defect similar to that seen in all nuclear binding > will reduce the net mass of bound muons, and they cannot annihilate easily > in bound form. Laser irradiation however, can and does completely disrupt > the quark identity when done properly. > > > > The muon will be by far the longest lived component of laser irradiated > protons (Holmlid’s version) but scatter for extended distances despite > being charged which tends to hide the enormous amount of energy released. > > > > In this view, quarks are leptonic combinations - muons at their core - > which is a radical departure from present models. > > >
