Jones— And lets not forget Philippe Hatt’s model of the makeup of the proton, neutron and muons (consistent with Stubb’s data and theory.)
About Hatt reported the following: “I was recently in Sochi ,Russia to present my views to colleagues and was asked to write articles to be published on that Unification topic..I am about to write the first one . May be ,I could send a copy to the Vortex list as these articles will anyway be written in English ? Please ,do not hesitate to send me your ideas ,advice on that proposal.” Thus, all physicists are not ignoring these models. Hatt just finished a revised model for the Russians (Yury Bazhutov, etal.,) after the presentation he made to the group in Russia. He recently reported this follow up: “1. Actually Newton's laws suppose that there is an instantaneous transmission , So ,the third law about action/reaction says that both are equivalent and opposed. Nevertheless ,we know that there is no instantaneous transmission since time intervenes .This is invaliding Newton's laws in the way that action occurs prior to reaction ,giving an advantage to action and breaking the symmetry between action and reaction. 2. According to my theory (see: philippehatt.com) the creation of mass occurs prior to its annihilation ,breaking symmetry between these two phenomena and giving rise to our material universe .Actually there is much more mass and antimass(resulting from the annihilation of mass ) than the mass observed in the universe ."Normally ",we perceive only the mass resulting from the action of creation of mass and the reaction of annihilation of that same mass (mass - antimass). 3. Electromagnetism is ,according to my theory, the combination of mass and antimass. Mass + antimass= negative electromagnetism ,antimass + mass = positive electromagnetism.The neutron has a negative dipolar magnetic moment,the proton has a positive one.Moreover the alpha particle's magnetic moment is null.The matter (which is the result of mass and antimass ,as well as of electromagnetism ) is influenced by electromagnetism which is nothing else than mass and antimass. 4. At which level is this influence exerted? At the quantum level where mass and antimass should be perceivable .So, matter and electromagnetism are two expressions of the same quantum phenomenon,hence the possibility of interaction between them ,even at some distance . Happy to discuss. I am presently preparing a number of papers for Russian editing .The first one concerns mass and antimass .The second will deal with electromagnetism , the third with neutron/proton differences ,the fourth being about electron and antineutrino and the fifth studying binding energy and LENR.” Bob Cook ________________________________ From: JonesBeene <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:12:24 AM To: Vortex List Subject: [Vo]:No, Melting Quarks Will Never Work “No, Melting Quarks Will Never Work As An Energy Source” This is from Forbes – not Fusion Technology, but it is hard to argue with it. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/11/08/no-melting-quarks-will-never-work-as-an-energy-source/#f23d01922327 However, there are other similar descriptions which semantically fall into place as a kind of “melting” of quarks at much lower energy, which would be outside this argument. To wit, the Holmlid effect. Here is an earlier thread on Stubbs and Holmlid. https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg104933.html The Holmlid effect of muon production from hydrogen annihilation, under William Stubbs’ theory is basically this (paraphrased to account for Holmlid): All matter is composed of leptons. The proton mass is composed of nine leptons whose mass is each about 1⁄9 that of a proton - there are three groupings of three and these are quarks. The particles which give quarks mass are identified as the muon/antimuon and have unit negative and positive charge, respectively so that there is a net positive charge of 1 in the proton. The combined mass of nine muons is 1,863 electron masses which is 27 electron masses greater -- but since the interaction is “binding” in the technical sense, a mass defect similar to that seen in all nuclear binding will reduce the net mass of bound muons, and they cannot annihilate easily in bound form. Laser irradiation however, can and does completely disrupt the quark identity when done properly. The muon will be by far the longest lived component of laser irradiated protons (Holmlid’s version) but scatter for extended distances despite being charged which tends to hide the enormous amount of energy released. In this view, quarks are leptonic combinations - muons at their core - which is a radical departure from present models.
