Will you all please knock this off. It is very un-professional.
Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Jul 4, 2017 6:56 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi v. Darden Hah hah, Eric is such a wuss. He allows insults from one side but not from the other side. Vorts are basically unwelcomed over there. It's the new hangout for the anti-Rossi anti-LENR crowd since Ecatnews shut down. ultrasure Beginner Likes Received 28 Posts 43 8 hours ago +1 #166 Eric Walker -- THE MODERATOR -- He will decide what the TRUTH is and if it is for ROSSI then it should not be heard. THE LENR BOARD WAS HIJACKED TODAY - JULY 4 Removed from the LENR Board: ** kevmol...@gmail.com 's account suspended for two weeks for incivility and being an all-around boor. ( according to ERIC ) ** sifferkoll 's account suspended for two weeks. It was just a matter of time. Next time will probably be permanent. ERIC WALKER CONTROLS LENR_FORM FOR ALL INDUSTRIAL HEAT COMMENTS. ======== Moved from the Rossi v. Darden thread. Eric On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: Here is Eric Walker's latest move of one of my responses over to his garbage thread, without explanation, without notice, and without moving the precipitating post which apparently uses the same offensive term of 'bullshit'. Online kevmol...@gmail.com Intermediate 37 minutes ago New woodworker wrote: Maybe the reason they aren't "all over this" is because it was bullshit. .... Then it would be in IH's best interest to document it and get the judge to see this guy is a lying con man. That would be in IH's best interest, wouldn't it? You find yourself in a legal tangle with some conman who posts all kinds of bullshit and one of those bullshit items is an offer to drop the case, would you as a lawyer be all over it or would you just do what you did right here and dismiss it as bullshit? But I suppose we should all defer to your extensive legal expertise and experience. Well I'm certainly done deferring to your extensive legal expertise and experience because you have been demonstrably wrong several times now. I'm just a layman but you're supposedly an expert and a layman is poking holes in your bullshit right and left. Display Less Moved from the Rossi v. Darden thread. Eric This post has previous versions that are saved. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: Ok then. At what point are you "disengaging"? If you "clarify" after you "disengage" you haven't really "disengaged", have you? At what point do you start moderating according to your own posted standards? On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: You say I have the last word but... then ... look below and now you have something else to say. You aren't even a man of your word. Just to clarify, Kevin -- I said I was disengaging discussing the matter with you. I think our discussion has provided people with enough information to put your initial complaint in context. I'll be happy to continue to discuss the matter with anyone else. Eric
