Hah hah, Eric is such a wuss.   He allows insults from one side but not
from the other side.

Vorts are basically unwelcomed over there.   It's the new hangout for the
anti-Rossi anti-LENR crowd since Ecatnews shut down.



<https://www.lenr-forum.com/user/1662-ultrasure/>
ultrasure <https://www.lenr-forum.com/user/1662-ultrasure/>
Beginner
Likes Received <https://www.lenr-forum.com/user/1662-ultrasure/#likes>28
Posts <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/user-post-list/1662-ultrasure/>43

   - 8 hours ago
   
<https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance-items/?postID=63980#post63980>


   - +1
   <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance-items/?pageNo=6#>


   - #166
   
<https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance-items/?postID=63980#post63980>

*Eric Walker* -- *THE MODERATOR* -- He will decide what the TRUTH is and if
it is for

ROSSI then it should not be heard.


*THE LENR BOARD WAS HIJACKED TODAY - JULY 4*


Removed from the LENR Board:


** kevmol...@gmail.com 's account suspended for two weeks *for incivility
and being an all-around boor.*

*( according to ERIC )*


** sifferkoll 's account suspended for two weeks. It was just a matter of
time. Next time will probably be permanent.


ERIC WALKER CONTROLS LENR_FORM FOR ALL INDUSTRIAL HEAT COMMENTS.


========


Moved from the Rossi v. Darden thread. Eric



On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here is Eric Walker's latest move of one of my responses over to his
> garbage thread, without explanation, without notice, and without moving the
> precipitating post which apparently uses the same offensive term of
> 'bullshit'.
>
>
> <https://www.lenr-forum.com/user/240-kevmolenr-gmail-com/>Online
> kevmol...@gmail.com
> <https://www.lenr-forum.com/user/240-kevmolenr-gmail-com/>
> Intermediate
>
>    - 37 minutes ago
>    
> <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance-items/?postID=63843#post63843>
>
>
>    - New
>    -
>
>
>
> <https://www.lenr-forum.com/user/2411-woodworker/>
> woodworker wrote:
> <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/4745-rossi-vs-darden-developments-part-2/?postID=63831#post63831>
>
> Maybe the reason they aren't "all over this" is because it was bullshit.
>
> ....
>
> Then it would be in IH's best interest to document it and get the judge to
> see this guy is a lying con man.   That would be in IH's best interest,
> wouldn't it?   You find yourself in a legal tangle with some conman who
> posts all kinds of bullshit and one of those bullshit items is an offer to
> drop the case, would you as a lawyer be all over it or would you just do
> what you did right here and dismiss it as bullshit?
>
>
>
> But I suppose we should all defer to your extensive legal expertise and
> experience.
>
>
> Well I'm certainly done deferring to your extensive legal expertise and
> experience because you have been demonstrably wrong several times now.
> I'm just a layman but you're supposedly an expert and a layman is poking
> holes in your bullshit right and left.
> Display Less
>
>
> Moved from the Rossi v. Darden thread. Eric
>
> This post has previous versions that are saved.
> <https://www.lenr-forum.com/edit-history/?objectType=com.woltlab.wbb.post&objectID=63843>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> ​Ok then.   At what point are you "disengaging"?   If you "clarify" after
>> you "disengage" you haven't really "disengaged", have you?
>>
>> At what point do you start moderating according to your own posted
>> standards? ​
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You say I have the last word but... then ... look below and now you have
>>>> something else to say.   You aren't even a man of your word.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just to clarify, Kevin -- I said I was disengaging discussing the matter
>>> with you.  I think our discussion has provided people with enough
>>> information to put your initial complaint in context.  I'll be happy to
>>> continue to discuss the matter with anyone else.
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to