Eric. Perhaps you have information that lets you know with certainty
that Thomas Barker Dameron did not add anything to what was put in the
patent. If so, please share.
AA. 1. Rossi says so and he is the expert.
2. There is nothing new in the patent from a quick scan. It
is just for other countries.
On 6/5/2016 12:05 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 10:22 AM, a.ashfield <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
When I said patents had not come up before, I meant with your
comments. Contrary to your claim about "generically" worded
patents, as explained, that was the only way to get a patent in
this circumstance. Mentioning cold fusion would ensure it was
rejected.
Your reply above does not bear on the point that was being made about
the patents, which I raised earlier in connection with the reasonable
behavior of Rossi. I was trying to show that Rossi's behavior has not
been that of a reasonable person, as seen in part through the patent
applications that have been filed. It was a weak point, with many
counterarguments that can be made, and so the point is not one that
needs to be pursued in detail. But it is worth considering.
AA. You are not allowed to add a name as inventor if he didn't
invent it.
Perhaps you have information that lets you know with certainty that
Thomas Barker Dameron did not add anything to what was put in the
patent. If so, please share.
Eric. We don't know that they're maintaining that it doesn't
work; perhaps they are, in which case perhaps that will come to
light later in a court document of some kind. What we know for
sure of their position is that they haven't been able to
substantiate his claims. In hindsight, knowing Rossi, this is not
a surprise.
AA. Really? We don't know that IH are claiming it didn't work?
You might let Jed know that.
What we know from several sources is that IH do not believe that
Rossi's results have been substantiated. A press release dated April 7
says that "Industrial Heat has worked for over three years to
substantiate the results claimed by Mr. Rossi from the E-Cat
technology – all without success." [1]. That means that from what
they've seen Rossi's stuff doesn't work, or it doesn't work to the
extent that Rossi claims. Can we conclude that IH believe that /none/
of Rossi's technology is real and has ever worked, apart from what
they themselves have taken a look at? That's a question for IH to
clarify.
Eric
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/industrial-heat-statement-on-meritless-litigation-from-leonardo-corporation-and-andrea-rossi-300248066.html
