I have followed this fairly closely and I haven't seen anything posted
by Rossi that would suggest the results were flawed. He did say the
temperature of 100.1C doesn't appear anywhere in the ERV's report. Show
me the actual quotes from Rossi that you think are damning.
As for who is playing God, one of my very first comments was we should
wait for more data because there is not enough in the public domain to
draw conclusions yet. You on the other hand are certain you know all
the answers based on information from IH. not from the independent ERV.
On 6/4/2016 11:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Jed, it doesn't matter how many times you make the same charges.
IH says one thing and Rossi another. Until there are actual facts
to look at. like the instrumentation used and the results, it is
not possible to know the truth.
I have looked at the results reported by Rossi himself. Not I.H.'s
version. I have seen the actual facts. So I can know the truth.
You have not seen the facts, so it is not possible for you to know the
truth. You have a _hell of lot of gall_ lecturing me about what is
true and what isn't! Who do you think you are, anyway? God omniscient?
It would be one thing if you expressed doubts or asked questions, or
if you said "well, I guess I should wait." But for you to dictate to
me that "it is not possible to know the truth" is outrageous
arrogance. You are saying I am incapable of any analysis. Also you are
saying that about the I.H. experts. You don't know anything, yet you
make these grand pronouncements and you dismiss our work.
- Jed
