my interpretation of substantiate is that they cannot replicate themselves.
If I was a VC like IH, I would not be afraid if a test fail, as long as my test are OK. but I will panic if the opposite. 2016-04-15 21:51 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > You are certain Rossi is a fraud, the ERV report is rubbish and the E-Cat >> doesn't work. >> > > Let us put aside fraud for a moment. The press releases make it clear that > Rossi says there is fifty times input, whereas I.H. says it did not work. > They were not able to "substantiate" the claims. That means they do not > think there was significant excess heat. > > If I.H. is right then yes, the ERV report must be rubbish and the E-cat > doesn't work. > > If Rossi is right, I.H.'s conclusions are rubbish. > > One of them must be drastically wrong. Based on their previous work, I > would say Rossi is wrong. > > (I hope no one quibbles about the word "substantiate." Whatever it means, > it rules out 50 times input.) > > - Jed > >
