a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: You are certain Rossi is a fraud, the ERV report is rubbish and the E-Cat > doesn't work. >
Let us put aside fraud for a moment. The press releases make it clear that Rossi says there is fifty times input, whereas I.H. says it did not work. They were not able to "substantiate" the claims. That means they do not think there was significant excess heat. If I.H. is right then yes, the ERV report must be rubbish and the E-cat doesn't work. If Rossi is right, I.H.'s conclusions are rubbish. One of them must be drastically wrong. Based on their previous work, I would say Rossi is wrong. (I hope no one quibbles about the word "substantiate." Whatever it means, it rules out 50 times input.) - Jed
