That's good to hear Mats. I greatly enjoyed your book and admire your courage in taking on this difficult topic.
It will be a joyful time should Rossi's results turn out to be strongly positive. If that's not the case, at least we have the possibility that BEC has a working system. Jack On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:48 AM Mats Lewan <m...@matslewan.se> wrote: > From the things I hear about the 350-day trial etc that Rossi/IH are > running, they are way ahead. > You don’t have to believe me. > We just have to wait until March 2016 when the results will be presented, > unless something unexpected happens before. > > Mats > www.animpossibleinvention.com > > > > On 10 Nov 2015, at 20:05, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jones, > > I agree that this could be bigger than anything Rossi has done. Sadly, we > still don't have a test from the Rossi camp (or replicators) that can even > convince many supporters of a COP much over 1.5, let alone skeptics. Godes > has always asserted that he thinks Rossi has something, but Rossi doesn't > know how to control it. > > McKubre seems convinced based on his statement made in the paper. That > goes a long way in my book--although not as far as a published scientific > paper by McKubre. > > Unfortunately for the open science community, Godes method is complicated > (just try generating a 200V pulse for 60 ns at 1-3 amps @100khz laterally > through a cathode while simultaneously running DC electrolysis with the > same electrode of nickel AND measure it all). I'm uncertain how he is > doing it in the gas system, but would guess it's not trivial. > > Jack > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:03 AM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> This announcement could be much bigger than anything Rossi has done, >> since McKubre/SRI is independent, well-respected, and usually is more >> circumspect about operating results than this. >> >> >> >> However, the Ni-H device sounds similar enough to the HotCat that we can >> probably expect patent litigation at some point. >> >> >> >> *From:* Jed Rothwell >> >> >> >> Two things about this are significant. First, they got into the Capital. >> Second, McKubre endorsed their results. >> >> >> >> I would like to see McKubre's report. >> >> >> >> See: >> >> >> http://coldfusionnow.org/brillouin-energy-corp-hosts-information-session-on-lenr-thermal-energy-technology-at-u-s-capitol/ >> >> >> Quote: >> >> Brillouin Energy Corp. presented its groundbreaking thermal energy >> technology on Capitol Hill last week. Attendees included Members of >> Congress, congressional aides, federal government officials, industry >> representatives, and citizens’ groups concerned with the federal >> government’s progress on developing clean energy solutions. >> >> “It was great to see that much interest in DC for a true safe green >> nuclear power technology,” commented Brillouin’s President and Chief >> Technology Officer, Robert Godes. >> >> Attendees were able to learn about Brillouin’s prototype LENR reactors >> and hear from a number of speakers, including Dr. Michael McKubre of >> Stanford Research International (SRI). Brillouin and SRI have entered into >> a technology research agreement under which SRI is engaged in calibration >> testing and independent analysis of the Brillouin technology. >> >> As Dr. McKubre noted in a report distributed at the event, “it is very >> clear that something on the order of four times (4x) and potentially more >> gain in power (and therefore ultimately energy) was achieved at an >> impressive and industrially significant operating temperature of around >> 640°C. To my knowledge this had not been achieved before in the LENR field. >> The fact that the Q pulse input is capable of triggering the excess power >> on and off is also highly significant.” . . . >> >> >> >> (continues) >> >> >> > >
