>From Jones:
> Oops typo. should be: "Therefore, a logical conclusion is that dark matter > is most likely a degenerate from of light matter, meaning that it is mostly > hydrogen in a different and denser form." > BTW - This would be the same species as seen in the many Holmlid/Miley papers, > which is called "IRH" or inverted Rydberg hydrogen. > Holmlid: "A much denser state exists for hydrogen ... and the bond distance is > very small, equal to 2.3 pm. Its density is extremely large >130 kg / cm3" > here is one paper: > http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/244/3/032036/pdf/1742-6596_244_3_032036 >From my layman's POV these explanations sound VERY similar to Dr. Mills' hydrino model which allegedly consists of smaller more sense hydrogen atoms that apparently exist in great abundance below the officially accepted ground state. Can someone lay out some of the basic differences that might exist between the Rydberg hydrogen model vs Dr. Mills' hydrino model? Feel free to clarify any misinterpretations I may have made in my previous wording. It might be a good idea to point out what the most significant theoretical difference might be between competing models of Dark Matter that apparently involve the hydrogen atom. I'm curious. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com zazzle.com/orionworks
