Matthew Yaklin wrote:

> An example would be the fire alarm panel should dial 877-386-4923. Yet we 
> collect the digits on the Metaswitch as 877-38923. That is it. The 6 and 4 
> are missing

...and then later wrote...

> [...] and no matter what we tried those two digits in my previous example 
> were always missing.

You wrote this here, but elsewhere what you wrote seems to suggest the symptoms 
seem more "random" than this (sometimes all digits are correctly decoded and 
passed on, sometimes different digits or different numbers of digits are 
missing, etc.).

----- Since I have been working with several different pots lines to several 
different alarm panels they all have a similar problem of collecting DTMF 
digits reliably before any SIP is involved. In the case of the one I was 
working today (gr303 sub) I can pull up all of its call attempts for the last 
two days in SAS and yes.. it was always missing the same two digits when it 
dialed a specific number. Very reliable failure situation.

----- On other pots lines the failure would be more random. The common 
denominator is that if you looked at what it dialed you could see the pattern 
of digits missing. Perhaps in one call example it would be missing 3 digits. On 
the next it would dial the same number and you would be missing 4 digits. But 
the same number was attempted to be dialed each time. If you knew the number it 
was supposed to dial to reach the central office you can see the pattern which 
was not obvious to us at first because we had to ask the alarm panel guy what 
it was supposed to dial. They contain multiple numbers in most cases.



If the mode of failure really is as consistent as you suggest here, though (or 
even if it happens the majority of time), have you considered recording the 
audio coming out of one of the fire alarm panels while it's trying to dial, so 
that you can take a spare Adtran, put it on the bench, configure it identically 
to one that you have in the field, and feed it a recording of the fire alarm 
panel dialing out, in order to reproduce the issue?  If you can repro outside 
of production, then you can test & iterate much more quickly (as well as at 
your own convenience) than when you are forced to test on an actual customer 
installation.


----- I have not considered that. I work remotely with all of this gear and I 
would have to guide a tech to do such a thing. I don't think a butt set and a 
tape recorder would be sufficient to record the audio which is about all I 
could possibly scratch up without spending money. I will freely admit I never 
had to go to such lengths to debug this type of problem. I was hoping someone 
came across this problem before and would say "hey Matt, alarm panels have this 
setting called XYZ. You need to change it to this. Or slow down the dialing 
settings which is available in every alarm panel I touched".

-- Nathan

_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Reply via email to