~Glen
On 5/14/2020 9:08, Paul Timmins wrote:
- What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID?
- People have been doing it for years
- Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info or P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere?
- It does if you want calling other toll-free numbers or 911 to work, otherwise it doesn't really matter.
- Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI?
- Does anyone need to?
- Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?
- If you have the certs, you can attest to whatever you want. It's designed to create accountability for originating carriers, not police numbering formats.
On 5/14/20 11:56 AM, Oren Yehezkely wrote:
Calvin,
I wonder if you got any insight to this question?
Regards,Oren
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:01 PM Calvin Ellison <[email protected]> wrote:
_______________________________________________It looks like Somos is pushing TFN CNAM, press release below from Mar 30, 2020. I've always understood TF ANI to be invalid.
What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID?
Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info or P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere?Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI?Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Glen Gerhard [email protected] 858.324.4536
Cognexus, LLC 7891 Avenida Kirjah San Diego, CA 92037
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
