Calvin, I wonder if you got any insight to this question?
Regards, Oren On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:01 PM Calvin Ellison <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like Somos is pushing TFN CNAM, press release below from Mar 30, > 2020. I've always understood TF ANI to be invalid. > > What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID? > Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info or > P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere? > Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI? > Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN? > > > https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toll-free-caller-id-information-helps-hhs-get-critical-phone-calls-answered-301031714.html > > > > Regards, > > *Calvin Ellison* > Senior Voice Operations Engineer > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
