> >I find it a lot more stable than AT&T VNC, even though it does have a few >>"oddities" of its own... > >I glanced that direction before I installed the AT&T version, but since >the last update of Chromi was almost a year ago, and it is listed as >alpha, I figured it was probably really unstable and mostly unsupported. > >But if you think it is more stable than the AT&T version (which I haven't >had any other problems with yet, but then, I have barely used it), then I >will at least take a look at ChromiVNC.
To be honest, I'm using a very strict interpretation of 'alpha' and 'beta' when releasing versions. Alpha means "the original developer is still finding bugs". Beta means "the original developer thinks it's bug-free and is letting other people bang on it". Time was, a program would only go into full release when both developer and beta-testers were satisfied that no bugs remained. So yes, I'm still finding bugs, and there are features not yet implemented. Unfortunately I have not had time to work on it properly for ages. :( -- -------------------------------------------------------------- from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not for attachments) website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/ geekcode: GCS$/E dpu(!) s:- a21 C+++ UL++ P L+++ E W+ N- o? K? w--- O-- M++$ V? PS PE- Y+ PGP++ t- 5- X- R !tv b++ DI+++ D G e+ h+ r++ y+(*) tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
