On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 07:22:45AM -0700, Michael F. March wrote: > The issue > I think is on most people's mind (or mine at least) is that > we all look to AT&T as the 'pure' source of VNC and from time > to time we would like AT&T to take the "best of the best" > features of all the features that have been brewing out > there and incorporate them into AT&T's own version.
I completely agree. However, AT&T has not shown any interest in producing updated releases or even talking about doing so for quite a while. I think it is the community's responsibility to create a fork which will fill the role of the "pure" VNC at least until AT&T decides to pick the project back up again. This is the role I see TightVNC taking. Constantin has done a fine job of adding features, incorporating user submissions, fixing bugs, and maintaining an all around great drop-in replacement for the AT&T release. -- Mike Ossmann, Tarantella/UNIX Engineer/Instructor Alternative Technology, Inc. http://www.alttech.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
