On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:51:22PM -0500, Alex K. Angelopoulos wrote: > Sure; my point is the method used for tying ports and displays > together. It makes use of custom lower-numbered ports significantly > more difficult.
What would be really nice would be a system by which display numbers don't have to be tied to port numbers at all, and only one port is needed on the server for an arbitrary number of displays. This is what Andrew has suggested in his RFB 4.0 specification draft. -- Mike Ossmann, Tarantella/UNIX Engineer/Instructor Alternative Technology, Inc. http://www.alttech.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
