Your reply leads me to the question, which has undoubtedly been asked before, are there reasons to use VNC instead of TightVNC? If there would have been the possibility to search in the archives I would have done so, but there is not and thus I have to find the answer this way. Fr. gr. Eppo R. Kooi.
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Michael Ossmann > Verzonden: dinsdag 26-feb-02 19:20 > ............ > I completely agree. This is one of the reasons some of us have been > talking about starting a new project to pick up the slack and try to > integrate many of the disparate improvements that various people have > come up with over the years. If and when this project comes to fruition > it will hopefully meet your needs. In the meantime, I recommend > TightVNC as a project which is in active development and is probably the > best general purpose VNC distribution: http://www.tightvnc.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
