That depends on what type of speed you have on your network, etc Use TightVNC if you need these features: * Bandwidth-cheap due to higher compressionlevel (if you have slower links than 1Mbit/s i.e. ISDN etc.) * More resource demanding on the host computer than other releases (VNC needs more computer power to compress screen info)
Use regular VNC if you need this: * Most recent updates check these homepages: http://www.tightvnc.com www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/ www.tridiavnc.com/ Good luck _____________________________ Gustav Bergquist Future Solutions AB Sjoflygvagen 35A S-183 62 Taby Cell: +46(0)70 445 24 60 Phone: +46(0)8 564 818 60 Fax: +46(0)8 564 818 67 http://www.futuresolutions.se -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of erikcw Sent: den 21 november 2001 23:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ATT, Tridia, or Tight? I'm preparing to deploy VNC on my company network of approx 350 WinNT/2000 machines. Which is the best distribution to use? Thanks! Erik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
