>> does it cause some kind of odd timing problems if both the patches
>> and the server try to do this, or is it not noticeable?
>
> It's not *too* noticeable, at least on my Quadra
But it *is* noticeable, then?
In what way? (i.e. what are the differences in _feel_ between the
buffered and non-buffered versions of vncPatches68k?)
What about on faster Macs (eg iMacs)? I suspect that it will generally
be fast enough that the 'double-buffer' (IYSWIM) does not have much of
an effect. Can anyone confirm that using the alpha 4 vncPatches68k with
the alpha 5 server feels practically identical to using it with the
previous alpha 4 server (on a fast Mac)?
Thanks!
=====================================================================
Adrian Umpleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wrench.et.ic.ac.uk/adrian/
=====================================================================
vncPatches68k:- http://wrench.et.ic.ac.uk/adrian/software/vnc/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
