>But that does prompt the question of whether vncPatches68k for alpha 4
>works fine with alpha 5 (now that the server has some similar functionality
>to the rect-buffering/splitting in vncPatches68k - does it cause some kind
>of odd timing problems if both the patches and the server try to do this,
>or is it not noticeable?)
It's not *too* noticeable, at least on my Quadra (which is what I've been
using to coarsely tune my code so far). I think it would behave "better"
with a straight-through path, though. When you get the chance, a
straight-through path with an incremented patch version number would work
splendidly.
--------------------------------------------------------------
from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not for attachments)
big-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uni-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.
Get VNC Server for Macintosh from http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/vnc/
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.12
GCS$/E/S dpu(!) s:- a20 C+++ UL++ P L+++ E W+ N- o? K? w--- O-- M++$ V? PS
PE- Y+ PGP++ t- 5- X- R !tv b++ DI+++ D G e+ h+ r++ y+(*)
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
