Felix, You're using a very old release of VNC, which would explain why you see poor performance over extremely slow networks.
VNC doesn't "stream raw bitmap data" (unless you explicitly configure it to...), and your assumption that an X11-based protocol will always be faster is not valid. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -----Original Message----- > From: Felix E. Klee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 February 2006 17:41 > To: James Weatherall > Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com > Subject: Re: vnc vs freeNX? > > Am Montag, 13. Februar 2006 18:20 schrieben Sie: > > 64Kbps is a pretty slow connection. However, as I stated > earlier, it > > depends *heavily* upon what you're actually doing as to > which will be > > faster, > > Most of the time we're working with Office type applications > on 1280x1024 > remote desktops. > > > and on whether you're using properly configured and up-to-date > > versions of the software... > > For exatablishing connections we're mostly using: > > vncviewer -bgr233 foo:0 > > But, maybe you're right and there's a little room for improvement. > Nevertheless, when one considers technology (instead of > streaming raw bitmap > data, NX streams X11 protocol data) I'm would be surprised if > VNC's speed can > approach that of NX under the given circumstances. > > -- > Dipl.-Phys. Felix E. Klee > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) > Tel: +49 721 8307937, Fax: +49 721 8307936 > Linuxburg, Goethestr. 15a, 76135 Karlsruhe, Germany _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
