On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:47:52PM -0000, James Weatherall wrote: > Have you fixed your patches as per our previous discussion regarding use of > a security type to introduce custom authentication methods?
No, I have not found time to do it yet and I am not sure, how I will do it. The solution, that I favour, is to create a chooser security type, which does basically the same as processSecurityTypesMsg(), but uses a bigger name space (eg. 4 byte) and supports Client side preferences. My other security types will get number beyond 256 and will be registered only in the chooser. mfg Martin Kvgler _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
