> From: Baolu Lu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2024 10:04 PM
>
> On 2024/5/15 15:31, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 10:57 PM
> >>
> >> + handle = iommu_attach_handle_get(dev->iommu_group, pasid, 0);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(handle))
> >> + return PTR_ERR(handle);
> >>
> >> - if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler) {
> >> - dev_warn_ratelimited(dev,
> >> - "iopf (pasid %d) without domain attached or handler
> >> installed\n",
> >> - fault->prm.pasid);
> >> + group->attach_handle = handle;
> >> + group->domain = handle->domain;
> >
> > this change also removes the warning message. Is it desired?
>
> Not desired.
>
> Perhaps we can add a message when the iopf handling is aborted.
> Something like below:
>
> err_abort:
> + dev_warn_ratelimited(dev, "iopf with pasid %d aborted\n",
> + fault->prm.pasid);
> iopf_group_response(group, IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_FAILURE);
>
> Though I am not sure which is better dev_warn() or dev_info().
>
yes this works. dev_warn() is fine as long as we don't expect it to
happen in sane cases.
