On 2024/5/15 15:31, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 10:57 PM
Previously, the domain that a page fault targets is stored in an
iopf_group, which represents a minimal set of page faults. With the
introduction of attachment handle, replace the domain with the handle
It's better to use 'attach handle' as the code does.
Done.
+ handle = iommu_attach_handle_get(dev->iommu_group, pasid, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(handle))
+ return PTR_ERR(handle);
- if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler) {
- dev_warn_ratelimited(dev,
- "iopf (pasid %d) without domain attached or handler
installed\n",
- fault->prm.pasid);
+ group->attach_handle = handle;
+ group->domain = handle->domain;
this change also removes the warning message. Is it desired?
Not desired.
Perhaps we can add a message when the iopf handling is aborted.
Something like below:
err_abort:
+ dev_warn_ratelimited(dev, "iopf with pasid %d aborted\n",
+ fault->prm.pasid);
iopf_group_response(group, IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_FAILURE);
Though I am not sure which is better dev_warn() or dev_info().
Best regards,
baolu
