On Wed, Nov 29 2023, Haixu Cui <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Viresh, > > On 11/29/2023 3:30 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 28-11-23, 20:58, Haixu Cui wrote: >>> On 11/27/2023 6:17 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>> On 24-11-23, 15:20, Haixu Cui wrote: >>>>> +For half-duplex read transfer, \field{rx_buf} is filled by Virtio SPI >>>>> device and consumed >>>>> +by Virtio SPI driver. For half-duplex write transfer, \field{tx_buf} is >>>>> filled by Virtio >>>>> +SPI driver and consumed by Virtio SPI device. And for full-duplex read >>>>> and write transfer, >>>>> +both \field{tx_buf} and \field{rx_buf} are used. >>>> >>>> Should the length of both the buffers in full-duplex mode be same ? If >>>> yes, then >>>> this should be mentioned (in case it is not). >>>> >>> >>> No, there is no such limitation. Write and read buffers may be different is >>> size. >> >> Hmm, I worked with a SPI controller over a decade ago, and I must be >> forgetting >> something here I guess. But from whatever little I remember, with full-duplex >> transfer, data flows on both MOSI and MISO lines as soon as clock signal is >> applied. And so amount of data sent is always be equal to amount of data >> received by both sides. >> >> Also if I see Linux's implementation of the `struct spi_transfer` [1], I see >> `tx_buf`, `rx_buf` and a single `len` field, which applies to both the >> buffers. >> Which I guess is indicating that both buffers are supposed to be of same >> length. >> >> What am I missing ? > > Oh so sorry for that. And I don't make it clear. Yes, tx_buf and rx_buf > have the same size, Linux has such restriction. Just as you mention, > kernel level spi_transfer has single "len", the same for > spi_ioc_transfer passed from the userland. > > But I am not sure if this is in the scope of the spec. Because this is > ensured by Linux, but Virtio SPI driver won't also can't verify this. > This is a prerequisite for virtio spi processing requests. > > What is your suggestion? How about adding some descriptions here, like > "for full-duplex, tx_buf and rx_buf are same in size, this is guaranteed > by the kernel"?
We must not really make any assumptions in the spec about concrete implementations (here, the Linux kernel), as someone implementing it in a different environment will need to make explicit choices. So, if tx_buf and rx_buf are required to be of the same size, it needs to be explicitly stated in the spec, or an implementation might choose to do it differently. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
