> I thought 7.3.796 fixed this so [^\n] is the same as '.'? Isn't that the case? Rererad my message. My point is that [^\n] should *not* be the same as '.' following the principle of least surprise.
Or tell me why there should be two ways to express the same - but no sane way to express [^\n]. If its not possible to make [^\n] behave the way you expect there should be an error instead. Marc Weber -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
