"VDR User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I will however give you an example. There was a time when the > majority of dvb users I talk to used VDR, and only a few guys used > MythTV. Now the opposite is true. The majority of those people are > using MythTV and few are left who still use VDR. Why? Primarily lack > of support for what's already been previously discussed a million > times.. Lack of support for HDTV, MPEG4, DVB-S2, and a recording > format that is actually usable. The only surprise to me is how many > people burn their recordings to DVD. I don't have any interest in > doing that but clearly a whole lot of other people do.
i'm not into dvb-s2 yet. Without talking about this hype technology, what about : - multiple frontend+osd support - complex channel handling (no no not talking about xml, i hate xml) - sourcecap patch (having to patch vdr for such a feature is a no-go for a lot of people) I tend to agree, in the end a lot of people will move to bloat^Wmythtv. (and i agree, a lot of people have stopped using vdr) -- _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
