indeed, but i can't take that risk without knowing the specific details for sure. this is a production system with thousands of customers.
would Bill Shupp possibly know?
At 10:00 AM 6/25/2004, Ken Jones wrote:
It might be as simple as changing the two "5" entries to "0" which from your listing below looks like the level_index0 and the_dir columns
Ken Jones
On Friday 25 June 2004 11:23 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > sooo - nobody knows where the directory 'incrementer' lives? Tom? i have no > fix? i'm stuck with going from > > /u1/domains/0/abc.com to > /u1/domains/5/def.com > > ?? no way to get the system to resume creating new domains under the more > logical /u1/domains/1/def.com? > > i mean, yeah - i can live with it. it's not affecting actual functionality. > > At 12:16 PM 6/23/2004, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > >well, now it's incremented up to '5'. eesh. what i've found in perusing > >the mysql backend db, is the following: > > > >mysql> select * from dir_control where domain = 'dom_89'; > >+--------+-----------+-----------+-----------+--------------+------------- > >-+--------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+----- > >-------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+-------- > >-+ > > > >| domain | cur_users | level_cur | level_max | level_start0 | level_start1 > >| level_start2 | level_end0 | level_end1 | level_end2 | level_mod0 | > > > >level_mod1 | level_mod2 | level_index0 | level_index1 | level_index2 | > >the_dir | > >+--------+-----------+-----------+-----------+--------------+------------- > >-+--------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+----- > >-------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+-------- > >-+ > > > >| dom_89 | 201 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 > >| 0 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 0 > >| 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | > > > >5 | > >+--------+-----------+-----------+-----------+--------------+------------- > >-+--------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+----- > >-------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+-------- > >-+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > > > > >there is no domain dom_89, which suggests to me this may be the 'master > >control' for what overflow subdirectory is to be used - it's the only > >record that has '5' for the value 'the_dir', and '89' is the vpopmail > > uid/gid. > > > >however, i'm reluctant to make changes to the record, for fear of, well, > >duh - completely destroying my setup with one bad keystroke. > > > >so, if anyone can confirm my speculations, and suggest how to fix it > >(that's right, i've never inserted data manually into a table!), i'd > >appreciate the help. > > Paul Theodoropoulos > http://www.anastrophe.com
Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com
