On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:50:12 -0300, fcassia <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Brett Serkez <[email protected]> wrote: >> Jakob, >> >> Did you consider the VBoxVmService before using Visual Studio? >> Without Visual Studio, this solution isn't an option. >> >> I was wondering if anyone has another other options? >> >> I was wondering if anyone else felt that perhaps there is an >> architectural issue with VBox in this area? Seems to me that perhaps >> VBox should be a service > > NO please don´t. I don´t like decisions like these being forced on > users just because someone has ¨special needs¨. > > Leave it as it is. And if you want to run it as a service using any > helper util (like the freeware one mentioned in this thread) and it > doesn´t work, perhaps sending an e-mail to the utility author so he > can test his freeware util with VBox and find why it doesn´t work > would be the most sensible approach... >
I must agree with FC. / Jakob _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
