> Hi Roberto, > > On 17.03.2011 10:46, Roberto De Ioris wrote: >> After 7 months of development the first stable release of uWSGI 0.9.7 >> is available. > > Congratulations! > >> A preliminary guide for packagers is available at >> >> http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/Guide4Packagers > > I am appreciating the "magic" way of loading plugins, so instead of > building of several uWSGI "flavours" with embedded language support, I > can just put symlinks for uwsgi_python26, uwsgi_ruby19, etc... But I > have a question: does serving with dynamically loaded plugin brings any > noticable overhead in comparision with serving with embedded plugin?
no differences. uWSGI is all hook based, plugins will attach to this hooks as embedded elements. > > Also handling of "magic" symlinks with '-' separator (say, > 'uwsgi-python26', instead or additionaly to 'uwsgi_python26') would be > nice. > This was my first choice, but i noted that gentoo already uses those names. I will need to refactor the magic-loading a bit to avoid collisions. -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
