* If *all* participants in an interaction MUST support TLS 1.3, then there is no
reason to support anything else. Unless of course, you expect some participants to violate that MUST, in which case, a document is being dishonest. You are not counting a non-updated deployed base (which surprises me, given your IOT involvement) and people who will not do the RFC. >An implementation which supports *only* TLS 1.3 will *not* interoperate. Good thing that’s not what the draft says.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org
