I'm told (by an AD) that uta-require-tls13 is supposed to apply to all ends of a new protocol.
Shrug. Anyway, it's much easier to make an RFC a performance specification (a trade term about RFPs) when the document doesn't depend upon some parties just ignoring the MUSTs. It would be better if the parties were honest and did not claim compliance with this draft.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org
