Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote: > Though I coughed a small part of the suggested text, I am not > particularly in favour of going down this rabbit hole in the present > document.
Do you object to anything in the GitHub PR, even if you don't exactly like it? Looking for rough consensus here. > I don't think this is the place to settle the IDNA2008/UTS-46 > schism. It doesn't do that, right? It just phrases the references to UTS-46 (already there) and IDNA2008 in a different way. I have to say, the current Section 2 is definitely wrong, and doesn't even correctly describe the IETF's mailing list software. So, anyone reading this document is going to have to understand UTS-46 in order to follow the XSS advice, right? > Nor is it the role of this IETF document to effectively promote > neutrality. I wouldn't say it does that. It just documents a mess. But this is all ok, at least we're talking about the text. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
