On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:46 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote:
> Rob, > > Leaving aside the merits or demerits of your proposed text, which I have > not yet read, I must say that I have found your tone throughout this > discussion to be simply appalling. > Maybe read it? It's perfectly reasonable. > > You characterized your exchange with Vint Cerf as "like arguing with a > teenager". > No. I meant that trying to ban emoji domain names would be like arguing with a teenager. They work, and if you ban them, then people do even more of that stuff, because you've banned them. You alleged that other WG participants are engaged in "pointless > fist-pounding" driven by a desire to "assert authority" instead of > accepting that perhaps they felt they were raising legitimate concerns. > I did write something like that in private email, and now you've made it public. It's pretty much the first rule of keeping things polite to not do that. I am not sure how others perceive you, but to my mind your behavior has > been arrogant, pushy, flippant, unprofessional, and disrespectful. > I believe your comment on GitHub was "take it to the list", right? thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
