It seems to me that UTS#46 torpedoed, deliberately, the two year attempt in IDNA2008 to curb some clear problems with IDNA2003. In all honesty, the idea of putting emojis in domain names strikes me as foolhardy. The better practice would be to use HTML to present some string as a hyperlink with the real URL "hiding" below.
v On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 6:04 PM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 2:26 PM John C Klensin <john-i...@jck.com> wrote: > >> >> That is clearly kicking the can down the road, but, until the >> now-closed I18n Directorate comes up with carefully developed >> recommendations about how to use IDNs when either standard might >> be assumed >> > > The biggest value any internet standards organization provides is a global > namespace. We have to get that part right. I agree that the discussion can > be tiresome, but saying "IDNA2008" is the standard is not correct. We have > to document the current practice, but that doesn't mean there was anything > wrong with IDNA2008 at the time. > > thanks, > Rob > > -- Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to: Vint Cerf Google, LLC 1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor Reston, VA 20190 +1 (571) 213 1346 until further notice
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
