Hi all,

Thank you for taking up this issue. We started the discussion based on work we 
are currently doing in IEC TC57 WG15, in the context of security event logging. 
As we rely on syslog and are using TLS to secure it, there was a request to be 
able to support it with current cipher suites as also motivated in the authors 
notes. That said, I would support adoption as well. 

While reading the current version of the draft I came across the following 
formulation in section 4 and section 5: 
"The mandatory to implement cipher suite is REQUIRED to be 
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256."
 
The choice is perfectly fine and also matches the supported ciphersuites in the 
TLS profile in IEC 62351. In the IEC discussion we assumed that the use of 
alternative ciphersuites is also possible. While the use of alternative 
ciphersuites is not ruled out explicitly, would it make sense to add a sentence 
like: 
"Other ciphersuites MAY be supported depending on the security policy of the 
operator. They should be assessed to provide appropriate security for the 
intended use."
 
Background for the formulation is to have an explicit statement regarding 
support of other ciphersuites. Interoperability by the draft is achieved only 
with the mandator to implement ciphersuite. This is clear. But if an operator 
decides to use for instance TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 it should 
be possible.  

Best regards
Steffen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uta <uta-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Salz, Rich
> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. April 2022 14:59
> To: Leif Johansson <le...@sunet.se>; uta@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Uta] secdispatched: draft-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-01
> 
> >    Folks - is there any interest working on this in UTA?
> 
> I support adoption.  I'll read and give feedback.  Should be a pretty easy 
> doc to
> finish off.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf
> .org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Futa&amp;data=05%7C01%7Csteffen.fries%40sie
> mens.com%7Cfe25baaac1d444bd40fb08da2396c405%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4add
> ab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637861427694289898%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb
> GZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M
> n0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=cHP3uc2qOAilxXAbNqaV4FqaraNrRQ
> Yuz2k5mCcLBcw%3D&amp;reserved=0

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to