The only open item left is around “multiple identifiers”  The main (only?) 
people participating in the discussion have been Martin Thomson and Ryan 
Sleevi.  Ryan contributed some text, it got some feedback from Martin.

The email thread started at [1] by Ryan. He proposed some text in an unrelated 
PR [2] that then get put into its own pull request [3]. It had some comments, 
and Martin thinks the Alpaca discussion could be improved [4].

Does anyone object to [3] being merged, and a new issue created to address the 
Alpaca concerns?  Peter and I would like to do so by early next week.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/EmT_XEKYQbVz50S4XFAhPCVwGbw/
[2] 
https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/pull/29#discussion_r722367686
[3] https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/pull/33
[4] 
https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/pull/33#discussion_r834900755
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to