* there are few errata for RFC 6125 with different status (mostly Reported, but at least one - Held for Document Update) - RFC Errata Report ยป RFC Editor (rfc-editor.org)<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6125__;!!GjvTz_vk!F3Ok1Iiv3Rz5Ezr4oWk8WK_Xguhx5ucVyCAYNnT1PrUoePN0skXdc-_yvMUY$> * I also think that authors of original RFC should be contacted and asked whether they want to co-author bis document (and one of errata was reported by them).
That makes sense, I will do that.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
