Rich, As I wrote, I think we’re past it, because this is about domain/IP address validation and not client cert validation. Correct?
Eliot > On 14 May 2021, at 16:02, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > >> There are a VAST number of devices that run off of iDevIDs: they never >> transition off of them. I’m not a fan, but that’s what they do. > > Okay, so this draft doesn't apply to them. There doesn't seem to be a > problem with, say, not using TLS 1.3 in cases, or not using ECDH in some > cases, so why is this draft different from those situation? >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
