> I think it would be much better to rewrite RFC 6125 with all the patches 
> applied, and then have that new document obsolete RFC 6125 instead of 
> updating it.

I took another look at 6125 and I am happy to put up a draft if the WG prefers 
that approach.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to