> I think it would be much better to rewrite RFC 6125 with all the patches > applied, and then have that new document obsolete RFC 6125 instead of > updating it.
I took another look at 6125 and I am happy to put up a draft if the WG prefers that approach.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta