Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I think the following text from Section 4.1 of RFC8314 needs to be updated as well. Is there any reason this is left out? Transition of users from SSL or TLS 1.0 to later versions of TLS MAY be accomplished by a means similar to that described above. There are multiple ways to accomplish this. One way is for the server to refuse a ClientHello message from any client sending a ClientHello.version field corresponding to any version of SSL or TLS 1.0. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
