Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't think it would have been necessary for this document to use the OLD/NEW style update. Effectively, you've replaced all occurrences of "1.1" with "1.2" and one occurrence of "TLS 1.0" with "TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1". I would think everybody who is smart enough to understand the content of the updated RFC, should also be able to make this exchange in their head on their own. However it's a short document no matter what, so probably not an issue one way or the other. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
