Hey Jason, With current UHD I have no suggestion other than what Marcus wrote. But I took a peek into our code; the X3x0 actually initializes in parallel (unless you disable that), but our MPM devices (which includes N320) don't. I can see how this is annoying, especially since N320 initializes longer than X3x0.
Do you have a point of contact for NI (like your sales person)? You could make a feature request. I can't promise any fast resolution but that would be a good way to get that addressed. You can also submit a bug report to github.com/EttusResearch/uhd, but it would get lower priority than some of the other things (as this is not actually breaking something). Cheers, --M On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:41 PM <ja...@gardettoengineering.com> wrote: > I have a project where I have to start up a series of N320 radios. > Currently we do it sequentially and that can take some time. Is there a > way to do them in parallel? I thought I saw somewhere that the driver was > the limiting factor for being able to have separate threads start up the > devices at the same time to speed things up, is that really the case? > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com > To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
