Hi Rob,
Thanks for the suggestions. I have tried deleting the LO sharing, and
nothing changes. Then removing the second addr, and that leads me to get
'Ds' in addition to the error already mentioned, as it is not able to
handle that much information. Although I don't quite understand the
difference between 'O' and 'D'.
>From what I understand the program is set up for a single channel, so I
need to modify it to get more than one.
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Anabel
El vie, 15 dic 2023 a las 15:39, Rob Kossler (<rkoss...@nd.edu>) escribió:
> Hmmm. I'm not sure. Here are a few comments:
>
> - Try running without "second_addr". I realize that you will need it
> for full rate (4 x 100MS/s for each X310), but you could run at 50 MS/s
> without second_addr
> - Try running without shared LO. I don't think you would need to
> physically change any sharing cables.
> - I am curious why you needed to modify the streamer, pointer buffer
> and file writing. I would expect that this would scale with the number of
> channels such that you didn't need to modify any code in this area
> - If you were using a more recent UHD, I would recommend switching to
> the example benchmark_rate which natively supports external PPS and
> multiple devices. I noticed that even the most recent rx_samples_to_file
> does not support external PPS (without modifying the code)
> - I know you mentioned you were unable to upgrade because of
> compatibility constraints. But, even if you cannot upgrade the OS, would
> you be able to install a new UHD - perhaps in a local folder that did not
> interfere with the system-wide UHD 3.12 installation. I typically have
> multiple UHD versions on my system and switch among them by "sourcing" a
> given setup file as needed.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:52 AM Anabel Almodovar <
> anabel.almodo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Rob,
>>
>> Yes, I use an external clock configuration.
>>
>> *std::this_thread::sleep_for( std::chrono::milliseconds(int64_t(1000 *
>> setup_time) );*
>>
>>
>>
>> *usrp->set_clock_source("external", uhd::usrp::multi_usrp::ALL_MBOARDS);
>> usrp->set_time_source("external",
>> uhd::usrp::multi_usrp::ALL_MBOARDS);usrp->set_time_unknown_pps(uhd::time_spec_t(0.0));std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(1));*
>>
>> I have only modified the code to get 8 channels and LO sharing. I want to
>> get a continuous acquisition setup without losing samples. But I am
>> starting with something basic at the moment. Any suggestions are welcome.
>> So I've modified the streamer, the pointer buffer, and added writing files.
>>
>> my line is
>> *$sudo ./rx_samples_to_file_v1
>> --args="addr0=192.168.60.2,second_addr0=192.168.50.2,addr1=192.168.40.2,second_addr1=192.168.30.2,recv_buff_size=900000000"
>> --subdev="A:0 A:1 B:0 B:1" --channel="0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7" --freq 800e6 --rate
>> 25e6 --bw 25e6 --gain 70 *
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Anabel*
>>
>>
>>
>> El jue, 14 dic 2023 a las 18:25, Rob Kossler (<rkoss...@nd.edu>)
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Hi Anabel,
>>> In my opinion, the error you are experiencing has nothing to do with
>>> streaming performance settings (such as "performance" governor, network
>>> descriptors, MTU size, etc). The issue seems to be that the two X310
>>> devices do not have synchronized clocks. In addition to the physical
>>> synchronization using OctoClock, you must also configure each device to use
>>> external synchronization and you must tell each device to reset its FPGA
>>> clock count at a common PPS. The typical sequence is: (1) wait for a PPS to
>>> occur (by querying either device), (2) tell each device to reset its FPGA
>>> clock at the subsequent PPS (this step must complete before the next PPS
>>> arrives).
>>>
>>> You mentioned that you are using rx_samples_to_file. Did you modify it
>>> in any way? What is your exact command line with all parameters?
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 10:29 AM Anabel Almodovar <
>>> anabel.almodo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Rob
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your answer.
>>>> I make use of the CDA-2990 octoclock as a source of synchronization
>>>> between both USRPs, in addition to local oscillator sharing. I use dual
>>>> 10GigEth connections and a MTU of 9000 to connect the USRPs to the PC.
>>>>
>>>> Due to various compatibility issues I am unable to upgrade the system.
>>>>
>>>> When I work with a sample rate of 10MSps I don't get problems but when
>>>> I increase to 25MSps I start to get the error. I need them working with
>>>> 100MSps. I have tried changing the CPU governor to "performance" to get the
>>>> maximum working frequency (*sudo cpupower frequency-set --governor
>>>> performance*), as well as changing the number of network interface
>>>> descriptors to maximum (*sudo ethtool -G <interface> tx <max> rx <max>*),
>>>> or increasing the dirty memory buffer (*sudo sysctl -w
>>>> vm.dirty_ratio=80; sudo sysctl -w vm.dirty_background_ratio=50*), but
>>>> I still get the same problem.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Anabel
>>>>
>>>> El jue, 14 dic 2023 a las 15:38, Rob Kossler (<rkoss...@nd.edu>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Anabel,
>>>>> How are you sync-ing the clocks on the two units? Do you have an
>>>>> external PPS source and are you configuring both devices to use this
>>>>> external source?
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, do you have the ability to upgrade your OS and your UHD
>>>>> versions? There aren't many user's that are using UHD 3.12 so if you have
>>>>> issues, it will be hard to get support.
>>>>> Rob
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 5:20 AM Anabel Almodovar <
>>>>> anabel.almodo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am trying to make an acquisition with two X310 equipped with two
>>>>>> TwinRx. I am using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64-bit and UHD 3.12. My PC contains
>>>>>> 128GB RAM and an Intel® Xeon(R) Silver 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz × 40 and a 4TB
>>>>>> SSD. I have modified the example rx_samples_to_file.cpp code to get 8
>>>>>> channels and I get the following error:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *D*
>>>>>> *[ERROR] [STREAMER] The receive packet handler failed to time-align
>>>>>> packets. 1002 received packets were processed by the handler. However, a
>>>>>> timestamp match could not be determined.*
>>>>>> *Timeout while streaming*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *[ERROR] [X300] 192.168.60.2 <http://192.168.60.2>: x300 fw
>>>>>> communication failure #1*
>>>>>> *EnvironmentError: IOError: x300 fw poke32 - reply timed out*
>>>>>> *[ERROR] [UHD] An unexpected exception was caught in a task loop.The
>>>>>> task loop will now exit, things may not work.AssertionError:
>>>>>> reply.sequence
>>>>>> == request.sequence*
>>>>>> * in virtual void
>>>>>> x300_ctrl_iface_enet::__poke32(uhd::wb_iface::wb_addr_type, uint32_t)*
>>>>>> * at
>>>>>> /home/rs3_lab/workarea-uhd/uhd/host/lib/usrp/x300/x300_fw_ctrl.cpp:135*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know how to solve the Timeout problem, I have tried to start
>>>>>> the acquisition 1.1 sg in time. But it didn't work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * stream_cmd.stream_now = false; stream_cmd.time_spec =
>>>>>> usrp->get_time_last_pps(0)+1.1;*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the problem and how can I fix it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Anabel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
