Hi Rob,
Do you mean instead of doing it across the register_property as the
set_int_property does, directly call the peek function?
Now I have this in the controller:
`register_property(&_test_reg, [this]() {`
` int test_reg = this->regs().peek32(REG_TEST_ADDR);`
` this->_test_reg.set(test_reg);`
` });`
Do you suggest changing it to something like this? (taken from
uhd/host/lib/rfnoc/ddc_block_control.cpp)
\
`double get_freq(const size_t chan) const`
` {`
` return _freq.at(chan).get();`
` }`
“_freq” seems to be also a property_t class as “_test_reg” is. What’s the
difference of doing it that way?
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
