On 20/02/2023 22:27, Wade Fife wrote:
Hi Joe,

The error you're getting basically means it can't communicate with the FPGA on the N320. It's sending a packet to the device, but it's not getting the response packet it expects. So it could be a network configuration issue, a cabling issue, maybe a firewall issue, or something else that's messing up the packets.

Double check the cabling and make sure you have the ports connected correctly. For example, connect the host computer port with IP 192.168.10.1 to the port on the device configured to 192.168.10.2 (the first port), or port 192.168.20.1 connected to 192.168.20.2 (the second port). Sometimes cables get swapped or port IP addresses get misconfigured and that can cause issues like this.

When you specify the "addr" argument, you're telling the software which port to use to do the initialization that's failing, so make sure that's correct and matches the configuration and cabling.

Wade

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:57 AM <jmalo...@umass.edu> wrote:

    With the HG image, things seem to be working fine. I can
    benchmark, and i can collect samples at not only the full
    rate(25e6 MS/S), but at a higher rate than the XG image, which is
    strange.

    _______________________________________________
    USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
    To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com


I'm going to guess, given what Wade said above (the error messages weren't immediately obvious to me) that when you moved   to XG, your physical hardware wasn't compatible.    The XG images are for 10GiG ethernet, so the SFP+ adaptors on both   ends have to match, AND you have to have a 10GiGe compatible network adaptor on your host, and it has to be
  configured correctly.


_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to