On 04/11/2022 16:21, Kenneth Burchfield wrote:
Rob / Marcus,

The initial-5GHz LO was my problem.  I was not providing it at startup.  Thank you guys for the info.  The mirroring is resolved!

-Scott
That's excellent!



On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 8:48 AM Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 03/11/2022 09:36, Rob Kossler wrote:
    When running N310 with external LO, the device will automatically
    try to run a calibration at device startup (actually in the
    software make N310 device) where it expects the external LO to be
    at 5 GHz.  If you supply an LO at a different frequency, this
    calibration will be ruined. Is it possible that you are not
    supplying a 5 GHz LO at startup?  Note that you can change it
    after startup to your desired freq of operation.

    And, responding to another discussion point about QEC correction,
    even if you disable the "tracking cal" you  can keep the "init
    cal" in place. I assume this means that an initial calibration is
    performed and then the calibrated gain/phase settings are left
    untouched afterwards.  So, disabling the tracking cal should not
    mean that you are not performing any correction - just not
    updated dynamically.
    Rob

    Thanks, Rob.  I had, once again, forgotten about the initial-5GHz
    requirement.

    The complete list of possible "init" and "tracking" CAL options is
    here:

    https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_usrp_n3xx.html#n3xx_mg_calibrations


    On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 4:28 PM Marcus D. Leech
    <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

        On 02/11/2022 15:53, Kenneth Burchfield wrote:
        Marcus,
        I agree.  Is there a way to tune the sideband suppression so
        that I can attenuate more of the mirrored signal?
        With the internal lo, everything seems to just work.  Are
        there extra configuration steps that I need to take to
        adjust for the external lo?
        I'm trying to find that out now.

        I suspect that spending an afternoon with the AD9371
        datasheet might provide some clues--but as to whether those are
          actually exposed in UHD is another question.

        With the internal LO, the chip has internal algorithms for
        optimizing phase and amplitude balance.  Those algorithms aren't
          "in play" when you use an external LO, apparently.

        One thing that *could* be done, but is tedious, is to adjust
        the phase and amplitude balance of the baseband signal to
          compensate for the imbalance of the mixer.   This is
        basically what the internal algorithms in the chip are doing, as
          far as I can tell.



        Thanks,
        Scott

        On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 2:41 PM Marcus D. Leech
        <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

            On 02/11/2022 15:27, Kenneth Burchfield wrote:
            Marcus,

            The sidebands do not change with the LO level.

            I am basically running the tx_waveforms example from UHD 4.2.0.0, 
and I am adding the argument tx_lo_source=external.  Attached is a picture of 
the spectrum. I am generating a SINE with wave-freq input 2e6. The center spike 
is some LO leakage. The spike at -2e6 is the mirroring I am seeing.

            Thanks,
            Scott
            The LO suppression looks to be about 55dBc, which is not
            horrific.

            The sideband suppression appears to be only about 30dBc,
            which is not very good.


            On 02/11/2022 12:09, Scott Burchfield wrote:

                Hi,

                Are there any updates on this problem.  I normally
                try not to reply to old threads, but I am seeing
                the same the same spectral mirroring Rob described
                earlier.  My setup is also the same as Rob’s.I have
                tracked some newer threads that mentioned disabling
                TX_QEC_INIT, but I am still seeing the mirroring
                after disabling QEC.

                
https://www.mail-archive.com/usrp-users@lists.ettus.com/msg07489.html

                Thanks,

                Scott

            It seems to me that if you use an external LO, that LO
            has to go through the phase-splitter on the mixer, and
            that phase-split is subject to errors, so turning off
            QEC may not be that desirable--although I think the
            mixer on the N310 (using an AD9371)
               is a 2XLO, so the phase error should be very very small.

            Do the unwanted sidebands change with LO level?


        _______________________________________________
        USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
        To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com


_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to