On 2022-04-21 10:52, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Hi,
Seems no one is looking into Ubuntu 20.04 compilation.
My X-300 is getting lonely...:(
If there are no objections, I can look it up myself.
I was thinking about fixing release_003_009_005.
Seems stable and hopefully need very little tweaking.
Since I don't know the code, I hope it's alright to ask here, if I
have any questions:)
These are all the errors I found with make -k (60% completion):
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/udp_zero_copy.cpp:193:29:
error: ‘class boost::asio::basic_datagram_socket<boost::asio::ip::udp>’
has no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/tcp_zero_copy.cpp:157:29:
error: ‘class boost::asio::basic_stream_socket<boost::asio::ip::tcp>’
has no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/udp_simple.cpp:59:46: error:
‘class boost::asio::basic_datagram_socket<boost::asio::ip::udp>’ has
no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/x300/x300_impl.cpp:1475:114: error:
no matching function for call to
‘boost::date_time::subsecond_duration<boost::posix_time::time_duration,
1000>::subsecond_duration(double)’
/usr/include/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp:285:14: error: no type
named ‘type’ in ‘struct boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<double>,
void>’
The first 3 I replaced:
_socket->native() -> _socket->native_handle() Compiles OK.
The last 2 are from the same place in x300_impl.cpp. This is a time
loop of 1 ms, until timeout. The code is perfectly
sound :
boost::system_time timeout_time = boost::get_system_time() +
boost::posix_time::milliseconds(timeout * 1000.0);
What this has to do with subsecond_duration?
From /usr/include/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp: 285
public:
// The argument (ss) must be an integral type
template <typename T>
explicit subsecond_duration(T const& ss,
typename
boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<T>, void>::type* =
BOOST_DATE_TIME_NULLPTR) :
base_duration(impl_type(traits_type::ticks_per_second >=
frac_of_second ? ss * adjustment_ratio : ss / adjustment_ratio))
I could rewrite the time loop in C, outside boost, but don't want to
break structure. Any ideas why is the compiler complaining?
TIA
Nikos
Ubuntu 20.04 *already packages* UHD-3.15.0.0, so figuring out how to
compile a MUCH OLDER release of
UHD on 20.04 would perhaps be useful for people who really, really
need a MUCH OLDER release of UHD.
But 3.15.0.0 already works out of the box from the package repos for
Ubuntu 20.04.
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
