Hi Wade,
thanks for your clarification.

________________________________
From: Wade Fife <wade.f...@ettus.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 1:03 AM
To: Marcus D Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com>
Cc: Oscar Pablo <oscar_pab...@outlook.com>; usrp-users 
<USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Re: question of X300 revision

Hi Oscar,

The drawing revision isn't the same thing as a hardware revision. I can confirm 
that the posted schematic is compatible with the current UHD source code.

Thanks,

Wade

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:48 AM Marcus D Leech 
<patchvonbr...@gmail.com<mailto:patchvonbr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Code sees like this, that support hardware must necessarily provide support for 
older equipment l—even models or revs that aren’t sold anymore. That’s just the 
nature of hardware drivers.

The schematic update policy is a business thing that I’m not qualified to 
comment on.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 21, 2021, at 9:57 PM, Oscar Pablo 
<oscar_pab...@outlook.com<mailto:oscar_pab...@outlook.com>> wrote:


i don't understand why keep the the source code for the product that will never 
show. and release a schematic for the product that will never show. if there is 
no source code to support the schematic then this schematic is no useful. i 
know x300 schematic hide the part of pcie. but if other part is ok then it 
still have value for reference if someone want to use some part of it.


________________________________
From: Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com<mailto:patchvonbr...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 3:13 PM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> 
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>
Subject: [USRP-users] Re: question of X300 revision

On 03/21/2021 04:16 AM, Oscar Pablo wrote:
Hi,
the public released X300 schematic is revision 1. i want to know if this 
revision is the revision in uhd source code. in uhd source code there is 
strange words "x300_clock_ctrl is not compatible with revs <= 4 and may    lead 
to locking issues" so what is the correct source code for revision less than 4?



_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- 
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com>


My recollection is that hardware rev <= 4 were pre-production and you'll never 
see them "in the wild".


_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- 
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to